The Demon (2o26) - written & illustrated by James Harren w/ colours by Dave Stewart
DC Finest - The Demon: Birth of the Demon (1972-74 / 1978 / 1979 / 1981) - written & illustrated by Jack Kirby w/ inks by Mike Royers + arcs w/ art by Michael Golden, Jim Aparo, Steve Ditko, & Dick Giordiano
Gone, gone, form of fan...
So, I've got the new Harren Demon from DC, plus a slab edition of Kirby era Demon to chew on like a zesty hell-flavoured dog "toy". No point-by-point bullets yet, because the Big Reading is happening n-o-w. Mike Royers' inks are something else, man. I was always a fan of Etrigan, dating back to when I was a kid, but the Kirby era stuff I never hit-- because it was never around? Seriously. Kirby Demon is a thing that I have never seen In The Wild, in thirty-odd years of dedicated longbox archaeology. According to Duin & Richardson's 'Comics: Between The Panels', Kirby's inspiration was a bald swipe from Foster's Prince Valiant-- December of 1937 to January of 1938. Val was running a con on the Ogre of Sinstar Wood, using the skin of a goose(!), quills for tusks, and webbed feet for ears. It worked: he scared the ogre to death. Kirby was so taken with the design he adopted it in 1972.
So the Demon is either fifty-four years old, our time... FOUR YEARS OLDER THAN MY ASS ...or he's a sprightly eighty-nine years old, dated from Foster's inception. Basically fucker is more ageless than Jason Blood-- who's had a rough time of it, if the Harren revamp is anything to go by. And I adore the Harren revamp. Blood is essentially Hellboy now, and what a righteous look for him: tore-up trenchcoat heavy with arcane oddments, iron bar topped with a magical pinecone, and a pocket full of gnomes & fae friends. I adore this shit. Much as the Demon & Blood's appearances in Ennis & McCrea's Hitman charmed my balls off, *this* iteration feels 100% Right. As in righteous. It feels like there's a place for these boys on the racks. Which I couldn't even say for the Matt Wagner iteration, a book I have encountered In The Wild, in longbox archaeology, repeatedly. Weird, honestly. Nobody really rolls for the Wagner miniseries. It's competent. But it's not Matt Wagner, to me, any more than it's Demon or Blood. This? This, I am hella eager to see where Herren carries us.
The first & final pages of this single issue hang in my mind like weathered tapestries from a castle wall. Supergood to have new, current comix in my veins. I BURN FOR MORE.
Nemesis (2o1o) - written by Mark Millar w/ art by Steve McNiven
(blink, blink) Reading time required: ten minutes.
Not the stupidest thing I've read this year, tho def contender for most mindless. Mark Millar could have written this in the time devoted to his morning shit. An appalling thing to consider, as I assume coffee factors in. I picture the man in classic Spider Jerusalem pinup mode, laptop on his knees, his fingers an impossible blur:
"NEMESIS MURDERIZES NINETY-SEVEN PRISON GUARDS IN RIOT GEAR WITH CRUEL, EFFICIENT CELERITY. IT WILL BE THE ONLY ENJOYABLE PART OF THE BOOK, AND EASILY THE MOST PORNOGRAPHIC. FANS OF MY WORK WILL EJACULATE LIKE THE MEDICI FOUNTAINS OF LUXUMBOURG, ONLY THE SPRAY WILL BE MORE WATERY AND YELLOWISH, AND NO-ONE WILL EVER VISIT THEM, EVER, MUCH LESS VOLUNTEER FOR PHOTOS. SUCH IS MY FAME. SPEAKING OF, MAKE A NOTE TO INVEST IN HANEBISHO BOG ROLL. CURRENT WIPES SUBSTANDARD & I NEED SOMETHING WITH MOISTURIZER."
Have now spent longer shittalking this comic than Millar did scripting it. 'Decompressed comics' were such a mistake.
Billy Bat vols 1-2 (2oo8) - written & illustrated by Naoki Urasawa w/ art assisted by Takashi Nagasaki
I don't know. The prospect of another meander into mystery by Urasawa initially thrilled me-- I quite liked 20th Century Boys, and Monster was sick fun... But maybe I'd rather have more Master Keaton or straight up revert to Pineapple Army. Pluto was by far the most concise & cogent manga I've encountered from this team, but it's not something I need to re-read. And if I'm honest with myself, the reason I drilled down so thoroughly on 20thC.B. (every time a volume dropped, I did a front-to-back re-read of the entire series w/ the newest volume as a chaser) was because, at the time, I was unfamiliar with the author's tendency to pretty much bluff everything. I believed there was a master plot ergo nothing was necessarily insignificant. That's not how Urasawa actually builds, though. He has to keep himself interested & invested, so he would only have rough goals, big notes, and let the little stuff develop as it occurred. He has to keep himself interested; and as a writer / artist, I can appreciate the desire for surprise. Nothing grinds the joy out of creation quite so thoroughly as a watertight script. But with this series, I just don't know. The prospect of 24-26 tankubon, and a multi-generational saga of Who Is The True Baddie, maybe it's my recently found mortality has me impatient at the outset. I am curious how it develops, but there isn't quite the fire to figure out the big mysteries in me, these days. Also it feels like Urasawa is self-consciously recycling character designs from 20thC.B. here... Though that could simply be his training with The Master, Osamu Tezuka; could be Naoki Urasawa developed his own Star System for peopling the work. Why wouldn't he?
I'll give it one more volume to properly hook me. But if not, no worries. If I need to work at a jigsaw, my husband has a collection. That's way more fun, and it doesn't toy with my faith in a finished product. The short version is this ain't bad. But Billy Bat ain't got me, yet.
