Last month managed to go a full month w/ my April stack titled 'March'. Bloody brain damage.
King Tiger - Comics' Greatest World: wk. 3 (1994) - written by Mike Richardson & Randy Stradley, and illustrated by Paul Chadwick
Here we go: action comix, wuxia style, by P.C. A thing I had forgotten exists! Brief, but a lovely little fight comic. I coulda gone for a full-length run of this. Didn't know there was a two-issue follow-up in '96... At any rate. If there's a single drawback in this ish, it's how Chadwick never clearly renders the tats on K.T.'s wrists. Not that it matters. Just curious. The binding magic circle King Tiger draws in this ish is fab. Grant Morrison browsed these, I feel like. What my parents' generation useta call eyeball kicks... A wild li'l 16-pager.
The World Below (1998) - written & illustrated by Paul Chadwick
Never read, this is yet another entry in the scintillating saga of ebay orders which turfed out because the seller misplaced the item. Seems to be happening with Chadwick, lately. Still haven't gotten my DHP #18. At any rate teething to read these. This is a placeholder.
The Autumn Kingdom, vol. 1 (2o25) - written by Cullen Bunn & illustrated by Christopher Mitten
Freshly arrived at the shelves of the Edgewater branch of Chi's library system. Random selection on the strength of the title / cover design. Should have browsed it first. Not enchanted by the narrative choices: fantasy author father's kids discover the occult "truth" about themselves & how they relate to their father's fiction. Namely, they relate to it with big silly swords and friction-free battles with Mignolaesque monsters. (Apparently Christopher Mitten was a BPRD artist?) I didn't properly read so I sha'n't be cruel. This book was not for me. Returned.
Bowling With Corpses & Other Strange Tales from Lands Unknown (2o25) - written & illustrated by Mike Mignola (& coloured by Dave Stewart!)
Not done here, but completed the titular tale. 'Bowling With Corpses' is the first Mignola comic I've enjoyed w/out reservation since 'The Screw-On Head'. Absolute joy. Thanks for un-retiring, Mike!
I suppose it bears saying, but I tapped out of Hellboy & BPRD when the big art changes began. I didn't want to read anybody else doing the main Hellboy tales. Obviously I've gone back since & done the Corben stuff-- a major oversight, on my part --and I've read the first half of 'Hellboy In Hell'. Hard to see such lovely art and admit I aged out of the character, but I suppose it was inevitable. Hellboy began printing when I was in high school, for chrissakes. BPRD became an ongoing when I first landed in Atlanta! Some stories age like dandelion wine: certain ongoing comix do not.
All of which to explain: the commercial success of HB was what killed the comic, for me. Mignola felt unable to provide interior art on a schedule commensurate with the franchise expansion, so he stepped away and gave the book to Fegrado for a bit. Which was bad enough, as the existence of the book, its very foundations, were in Mignola's ability to enjoy the medium. He became super OCD about his own polish, after the movie-linked sales surges. And, to be honest? I didn't want to see Fegrado aping Mignola-- I need Fegrado to be Fegrado. As for BPRD, the title ran off Guy Davis-- speaking of artists I've been following since high school. A franchise can't frustrate its primary visual creators and stay gold, in my experience. So I dipped on everything.
But selah to all that. Bowling With Corpses is a fresh start, for me & Mignola's thing, that magic he's been pulling off since the Fafhrd & The Gray Mouser adaptations with Chaykin. For me, that's when Mignola's aesthetic clicked. Man's had me hooked ever since. This new thing is the purest distillation of the creative ecstasy Mike expresses via his deeply atmospheric pacing. Nobody draws skulls, clocks and mounds of dusty manuscripts like ya boy!
Buff Soul (2o22) - written & illustrated by Moa Romanova
A library pick purely based on aesthetics. Decadent!!! The story is a charmer. A lovely portrait of friendship & party-lifers, and recognizing priorities. I'll check out more Moa, for sure.
Peter Cannon: Thunderbolt - Watch (2o2o) - written by Kieron Gillen & illustrated by Caspar Wijngaard
At some point it became a project to read as many Watchriffs as I could get my hands on. This riff had eluded me, until now. I like that this is a Big Gay Comic about capeshit. It amuses me that the artist is doing an Eddie Campbell impression. It's in the mail & on the way. It should be a kick.
The New Statesmen (1988/1989/199o) - written by John Smith & illustrated by Jim Baikie, Duncan Fegrado, and Sean Phillips, + Brendan McCarthy, David Hine, & Shaky Kane (uncredited)
Refreshing my reading. This time it's the business. Finally, at last, I'm familiar enough with the story to be impressed with the plotting & pacing. Unlike other John Smith jams, this one is structurally a stone cabin: every piece has its place, and all together they form a structure that refuses to tumble. If there's a drawback it's needing to keep notes, because the cast is bloody massive.
Since the last time I read thru, those horsechoker editions of 'The Boys' came across my desk. I'm finding it a little hard to not think about that stupid, stupid comic, and the stupid, stupid, stupid teevee version. Because everyone talks about how Watchmen was grownup, serious, etcetera-- but what always stuck with me, from my earliest exposure, was how British and bloody-eyed the tale is. There's some grotesque violence spilling off the page in that book-- but Watchmen, for all its cred as an adult tale of sex and violence, contains strikingly little of either eyeball kick. If you wanted that (and every teenage boy did, even us gayboys) then you had to march on over to Marshall Law.
But Marshall Law is a revolting-looking book. No disrespect to Kevin O'Neill, who's a titan, but ugh. The bodies and the blood are both repellant. So if it's eyeball kicks and gratuitous, perverse chuckles you wanted, well-- we all kind of had to wait for Ennis and The Boys to happen. Didn't we?
Turns out we didn't. Because there was 'The New Statesman'. A book with nothing nice to say about superheroes, or american politics, that idiotic national pasttime which has somehow come to engulf all of culture, art, and sport. A book which begins its action proper with a hate crime, and the hateful reaction engendered by it. A book that does not like power fantasies because of the power imbalances baked in. You have to be disenfranchised and marginalized and Know It to enjoy american politics and pretend the commentators believe their own chirpy commentary.
This is a book about lies of all sizes. Theirs, and ours, and the world's.
Here we have a power fantasy comic by a gay writer, about being gay, angry & depressed by the status quo. 'The Boys' couldn't manage that, not least because Ennis can't stop laughing about how embarrassing queer sex must be for the queers. This is not to say 'The New Statesmen' is humourless; merely that the laughs are grim'n'gritty laughs, for an audience who feels none-too-secretly bruised by the ceaseless politicization of their sexuality. Here we have a book all the colours of bruising.
The first, foremost moment of fantasy in 'The New Statesmen' is of a queer american victim-- who will never admit he has been victimized --taking out a swath of white christian fundamentalists, in full view of the world. It's the second fantasy, in truth, second string to the actual first fantasy, that of a closeted, queer brit who once did something publicly terrible he can't quite remember. He wants to be Out, to Love, but he's too secretly crazy and filled with rage to have that happiness, and so he accepts his lot, as a bought-and-sold instrument of Empire.
If there's an allegory in there, I'm sure it has nothing to do with the writer's personal position on these matters. Or his position in the culture, working with patient fury (as he once did) to gain entree into American comix, staffed directly behind Morrison & Millar, all of them with eyes further up the line, observing Ennis cutting in somewhere after Mills, all of them at the gate, jealous eyes on Gaiman catching up with Moore as Wagner helps sort the baggage claims at customs.
In this reading, if I find a fault with any of this, it's that there aren't any women being permitted to make a point about all the bullshit and hypocrisy. The sexism in this book is no less than the sexism of Watchmen-- sexism is a very apt Point, in both Watchmen & The New Statesmen --but it's not one that's made particularly compellingly, with real heart. The sexism is more reportorial than rage-based, more passing observation than rejoinder. The women in these stories are Used, are Useful, but they are not the subject, and their gender is secondary to their sexual utility in the dramatic webs woven.
But who wants a perfect book? It's in its imperfections that 'The New Statesmen' is superior to Watchmen, because it's not pretending to perfection; this fantasy about power is as imperfect as the world it chronicles, and it is with no great satisfaction that I observe that the world in these pages is thuddingly closer to our present than the alternate history provided by Moore & Gibbons. John Smith was lobbing bricks, and their gravity landed in the zone of Truthiness we Americans, regretfully, inhabit. A stark, grubby shithouse of a comic, this.
I need to read it again.